- Personal Injury FAQs
- Car Accident FAQs
- Workers Compensation FAQs
- Nursing Home FAQs
- Wrongful Death FAQs
- Social Security Disability FAQs
- Drunk Driving Accidents FAQs
(Refer to the $160,000: Dog Bite Case) In a dog-bite case, like car accident and other personal injury cases, the magnitude of the injury is the most important evidence. While medical professionals can testify about injuries persons have sustained, nothing tells the story of an incident better than photographs. While the injured combat veteran only treated a few times after the dog-bite incident and made a full recovery within weeks, the professionals at Arnold & Smith were able to use the photographs taken of the veteran’s post-attack facial injuries to convince the property owner’s insurance company to settle for an amount that was 40-times more than the veteran’s medical bills.
- Can I Wait a Few Months to Pursue a Personal Injury Claim?
- Should I Trust the Insurance Adjuster?
- The Insurance Adjuster Is Saying I Am Partially Negligent. What Does That Mean?
- May I Choose My Own Doctor in a Personal Injury Case?
- What Can You Sue for in a Personal Injury Case?
- What If the Accident Was My Fault?
- What If the Medical Condition Improves Before the Hearing?
- If an Incident Report Was Filled Out, Do I Have a Right to Receive a Copy?
- What Should I Do If I Have Been Injured by Another Party but I Can't Afford a Lawyer?
- Do I Have to Sign a Release Allowing the Insurance Company to Get My Medical Records?
- The Insurance Company Wants to Send Me to Their Own Doctor for a Second Opinion
- I Have Been Injured on Another Person's Property. What Should I Do Now?
- Can I Recover Damages for My Child’s Injury They Suffered While Trespassing?
- When Can I Sue for Medical Malpractice?
- What Does the One-Bite Rule Mean in NC Dog Bite Cases?
- What Does Arising out of Employment Mean?
- Am I Required to Help a Person in Need? (Duty to Rescue)
- How Much Time Do You Have to File a Personal Injury Lawsuit in North Carolina?
(Refer to the $1.15 Million: Car Accident Case) The young man’s case illustrates why out-of-court settlements are valuable. First, the person who swerved into the young man’s lane and caused the crash was a teenager. He was driving his mother’s car. The teenager’s mother was bankrupt, and her house was in foreclosure. The bottom line is that even if the young man sued the teenager and his mother and won a $3-million judgment, he would never have collected a penny, because the teenager and his mother had no collectible assets.
More importantly, however, Arnold & Smith’s client—the young man—suffered post-traumatic stress after the accident and had trouble speaking about it. He feared having to go to court and having to testify about what happened. Through tough advocacy and out-of-court negotiation with several insurance companies, the professionals at Arnold & Smith were able to recover the full amount of all available insurance coverage, without having to go to court. Needless to say, the client was pleased with the outcome.
(Refer to the $255,000: Wrongful Death Case) Insurance coverage is one of the most important—and complicated—features of a personal injury case. When at-fault drivers have minimum coverage on their vehicles, injured persons must often look to underinsured motorist coverage from insurance policies that can legally be “stacked” together to accumulate coverage. The laws regarding insurance coverage and “stacking” are extremely complex and ever-changing.
The professionals at Arnold & Smith are on the front lines of the development of insurance coverage, advocating for the most coverage to adequately compensate innocent victims of the conduct of negligent drivers. Aside from maximizing results for individual clients, the reported appellate decisions Arnold & Smith has won on behalf of families have expanded and reinforced the rights and interests of injured persons.
(Refer to the $150,000: Car Accident Case) As in many cases, the young woman’s medical bills far exceeded the amount of available insurance coverage. The man who hit her with his truck had no collectible assets. To make matters worse, the young woman’s medical bills were paid by her health insurer under what is called an “ERISA” plan. When those kinds of health plans pay for a person’s medical treatment after a car crash, the health plans are entitled to be reimbursed. Theoretically, in a case like the young woman’s, where the medical payments made by the health plan—over $200,000—are more than the settlement amount, the health plan can take all of the money.
Fortunately, the professionals at Arnold & Smith were able to negotiate with the young woman’s health plan, convincing the plan to accept less than one-sixth of the amount it sought in reimbursement. This meant that the client—the young woman injured in the crash—walked away with over $60,000 in her pocket—instead of losing everything to her health plan.
Medical liens, ambulance liens, health plan liens, and other liens often attach to any money an injured person may recover after an accident. While the law makes it an injured person’s responsibility to pay these liens, oftentimes injured persons are not aware of this responsibility and do not know how or where to look to find out the claimed lien amounts or how to reduce them. The professionals at Arnold & Smith work with lien holders to reduce and resolve liens and to maximize the recoveries that clients obtain in accident cases.
(Refer to the $150,000: Drunk Driving Accident Case) Mixing alcohol and motor vehicles is a deadly combination. Even when an intoxicated person injured in an accident was not the driver, the person’s intoxication may provide insurance companies with opportunities to argue that the injured person was at fault for one’s own injuries. In one case, a client became drunk at a party. Through the testimony of other witnesses, the client learned that he engaged in rude behavior and eventually passed out. Afterward, his friends carried him outside and loaded him into the backseat of another friend’s vehicle. Later, the friend returned to his vehicle and attempted to drive home, but crashed on the way, killing himself and grievously injuring the client.
The insurance companies involved in the case, through their attorneys, argued that the client should receive nothing, because his own intoxication led to him being loaded into the friend’s vehicle. Or, they argued, the client lied, and he got into his friend’s vehicle to ride home, knowing his friend was drunk.
Through tough advocacy, negotiation, and in-court litigation, the professionals at Arnold & Smith were able to overcome the insurance companies’ arguments and obtain $150,000 on the client’s behalf. The client’s case underscores how alcohol can potentially damage an injured person’s case even where the injured person was not a driver.
(Refer to the $120,000: Injured Passenger Case) In a pair of cases, intoxicated vehicle owners handed their keys to friends to drive, and their friends crashed their cars, injuring them. The professionals at Arnold & Smith were able to settle the cases for $70,000 and $50,000, respectively, but not without a fight.
In North Carolina, a person who allows someone else to drive one’s car must exercise reasonable care in the choice of a driver. For example, if the person knows the driver speeds, is reckless, or is intoxicated, and hands over the keys anyway, the person will not be able to recover damages if the driver causes an accident. In fact, the person handing over one’s keys may be liable to third parties who are injured by the driver’s negligence.
Where, however, an injured person had no reason to believe a driver was reckless or intoxicated, and the person is subsequently injured in a crash in one’s own vehicle, the person can recover damages from one’s own insurance carrier. It may seem odd, but the person’s own carrier pays for the negligence of the driver the injured person chose.
- I Was Involved in a Motor Vehicle Accident with Injuries. Do I Need a Lawyer?
- If I Am Injured in a Car Accident or at Work What Should I Do?
- Is a Tractor-Trailer Accident the Same as an Automobile Accident?
- Who is at Fault in a North Carolina Chain Reaction Car Accident?
- Do You Need to Give My Insurance Company a Statement After a Charlotte Car Accident?
- Why do I Need to Seek Payment From My Car Insurance When I Was Not at Fault?
- What Does Full Coverage Car Accident Insurance Mean?
- When are Companies Responsible for Car Accident Injuries?
- Are North Carolina Drivers Required to Purchase Car Insurance?
- The Other Driver in My Car Accident Plead Guilty in Traffic Court
- What Type of Damages are Available to North Carolina Car Accident Victims?
- Can I Stack Multiple Insurance Claims After My Car Accident?
- Why Does the Insurance Company Deny My Claims?
- How Long Does Settling a North Carolina Car Accident Typically Take?
- What Happens if an Uninsured Motorist Refuses to Pay Damages?
- What Types of Compensation can I Recover in an Uninsured Motorist Claim?
- Do I Have to Give My Information to an Insurance Company?
- What are the Minimum Auto Insurance Requirements in North Carolina?
- How Many Uninsured Drivers are There in North Carolina?
- Will I Have to Sue the Uninsured Motorist’s Insurance Company?
- Why Do I Need an Attorney After My Charlotte Car Accident?
- Do I Have a Valid Uninsured Motorist Claim in North Carolina?
- How Long do I Have to File an Uninsured Motorist Personal Injury Lawsuit?
- I Settled with the Other Driver, can I Still Claim Uninsured Motorist Insurance?
- Who is Responsible in North Carolina Drunk Driving Car Accidents?
- Do I Have to Talk to the Insurance Company After a Car Accident?
- Should I File an Insurance Claim with My Insurance Company After a Car Accident?
NOTE: Many individuals will qualify for workers’ compensation under North Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Act. All questions except the first discuss workers’ compensation under this state Act.
The NC Workers’ Compensation Act, adopted in the 1930s, aims to compensate employees who are injured by accidents at work and occupational disease. Workers’ comp aims to make “industry pay for its own wreckage,” in the words of the court. It strikes a balance between employers and their employees.
- For employers, workers’ comp provides the benefit of reduced liability expenses because it:
- Sets full disability compensation rates at two thirds of the employee’s average weekly pay instead of 100 percent
- Excludes employee compensation for pain and suffering
- Is the “exclusive remedy” for employees. This means an employee cannot usually sue their employer in a personal injury suit for workers’ comp injuries.
- For employees, workers’ comp provides the following in accepted cases:
- Medical care at no cost to the employee
- Prompt temporary full or partial disability payments that continue weekly as the case goes on.
- By contrast, in standard personal injury cases, the insurance company or other defendant does not have to pay for medical bills or lost wages until the case settles or trial concludes.
- Permanent disability benefits if applicable
- Contributory negligence is eliminated as a defense. North Carolina is one of two states that still use a contributory negligence model in injury cases. This means that if a person’s own actions contributed in any direct amount to their injuries, they cannot sue to recover against the person that caused the majority of the injury. For example, a driver that was found to be 10 percent at fault in a car accident could not recover in damages from the driver who was 90 percent at fault. Eliminating contributory negligence as a defense in workers’ comp means that an employee’s contributory negligence will not be a bar to them receiving workers’ comp benefits.
If you are injured on the job, in most cases you may be entitled to make a claim for workers’ compensation insurance benefits. Depending on your employer, you may need to file a federal or state claim for workers’ compensation. If you are a veteran, there are further resources available to help you file your claim.
- Federal employees: The Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) gives compensation benefits to civilian employees of the United States federal government who sustain a personal injury or disease related to performing their job duties. The FECA can also provide the payment of benefits to the injured employee’s dependents if the injury or disease results in the employee’ death. The online guide to FECA resources can be found at Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (DFEC) Page.
- Private or state employees in NC: The North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act requires almost all employers that regularly employ three or more employees to either carry workers’ compensation insurance or qualify with the North Carolina Department of Insurance as a self-insured employer. The North Carolina Industrial Commission’s online guide to filing a claim under the NC Workers’ Comp Act can be found at If You Have Been Injured At Work Page.
- Veterans of the United States Armed Services: The Veterans Health Administration’s National Workers’ Compensation Program provides staff, support and resources to help members and veterans of our nation’s armed services apply for and obtain the workers’ compensation to which they are entitled under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. Although this is the same federal act that applies to other federal workers, the VHA’s Workers’ Comp staff are much more suited to helping individuals file non-civilian claims. Find the VHA’s guide to Workers’ Compensation at Workers’ Compensation Program Page.
If you are not sure whether you have a claim or not: The experienced workers’ compensation attorneys at Arnold & Smith, PLLC are ready to step in to help ensure that you do not miss out on a claim you might not think is covered. Our attorneys handle the stress and worry of dealing with your employer, the insurance company and the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Mr. Arnold is experienced in handling injury claims, having formerly worked as an insurance defense attorney handling injury claims for insurance companies.
- If your injury is minor and your employer does not dispute your workers’ comp claim: You still may be able to benefit from contacting the dedicated attorneys at Arnold & Smith, PLLC to ensure that your matter is handled efficiently and correctly while avoiding costly mistakes.
- If your injury is more severe or your employer is refusing to compensate you: Our experienced attorneys are ready to intervene and fight on your behalf. Our attorneys are skilled at preliminary negotiations and mediation, but unafraid to take the fight to the courtroom all the way to trial if necessary to get you the compensation you deserve. Our attorneys will not settle until you are satisfied.
- If your claim is denied: You still have options. Deserving victims’ claims are often denied, and this is where your attorney will step in to fight for just compensation.
- What Constitutes Nursing Home Negligence?
- What Information Will Be Helpful for My Nursing Home Negligence Claim?
- What Will Happen After I File My Nursing Home Complaint?
- What Exactly Is a Wrongful Death Claim?
- Are the Laws or Rules Applying to a Wrongful Death Claim Different from a Personal Injury Not Involving Death?
- What Are My Chances of Winning My Social Security Disability Claim?
- What Is Partial Versus Total Disability, and Temporary Versus Permanent Disability?
- Drunk Driving Car Accident FAQs
- Who Has a Civil Claim for Damages in a Drunk Driving Accident?
- How Does North Carolina Define Driving While Impaired?
- Why do I Need an Attorney After Suffering an Injury in a Drunk Driving Accident?
- How Long do I Have to File a Drunk Driving Personal Injury Lawsuit in North Carolina?